Supreme Court Upholds Trump Policy on Passport Gender Markers

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of former President Donald Trump’s policy restricting gender markers on U.S. passports, requiring that passports reflect a person’s biological sex at birth. The decision, passed 6-3, eliminates the option for the ‘X’ gender designation that had been available under prior rules, effectively enforcing the Trump administration’s stance on federal documentation. The ‘X’ marker had been implemented in October 2021 under the Biden administration to accommodate non-binary and transgender individuals. Trump, upon beginning his second term in 2025, issued executive orders aimed at restoring what he described as “biological truth” in government records, including passport designations.

The policy sparked immediate legal challenges. In April 2025, a federal judge blocked enforcement, arguing that the restriction required intermediate judicial scrutiny because it classified applicants based on sex. Critics warned that the policy could harm non-binary and transgender individuals navigating official documentation. The Trump administration appealed, and the Supreme Court granted a stay, allowing the policy to take effect while litigation continues. The Court reasoned that recording biological sex at birth is akin to noting a factual element like country of birth and does not violate the Equal Protection Clause. It also rejected claims that the policy was motivated solely by animus.

The ruling directly affects passport applications nationwide, requiring non-binary and transgender individuals to select male or female. Advocates warned that the policy could create practical and psychological challenges, while supporters argued it preserves government consistency and accuracy in official records.

The decision has broader political and social implications. It represents a clear win for Trump’s conservative agenda and could influence similar federal policies. Critics foresee conflicts with state laws allowing non-binary designations, suggesting ongoing legal and cultural debates over the recognition of gender identity in government documentation.

Related Posts

Beloved 2000s Rock Star Passes Away at 47 — Details

Brad Arnold, founding member and lead singer of 3 Doors Down, passed away at age 47, leaving fans and the rock community in shock. The band confirmed…

Coco Jones Stuns Super Bowl 2026 Audience With Stirring Performance of ‘Lift Every Voice and Sing’

Coco Jones delivered one of the most moving moments of Super Bowl 2026 even before kickoff, transforming the pregame ceremony into something far bigger than football. Introduced…

What Do NFL Players Think About Bad Bunny Performing at the Super Bowl Halftime Show?

Bad Bunny’s selection as the Super Bowl halftime performer sparked debate online, but a closer look inside NFL locker rooms shows a quieter and more complex reaction….

The Voice UK contestant Dean Franklin passes away aged 36 – just eight weeks after being diagnosed with terminal oesophageal cancer

Dean Franklin, a former contestant on The Voice UK, has passed away following a rapid and heartbreaking battle with terminal oesophageal cancer. The London-born singer, mentored by…

What the Numbers on Your Egg Carton Really Mean

I only learned the truth after that cursed dinner: the Julian date is the egg’s real birthday, and it doesn’t always match the friendly “sell by” stamp…

Why Bad Bunny won’t be paid at all for his incredible Super Bowl halftime show

Bad Bunny delivered one of the most talked-about Super Bowl halftime performances in recent years, yet like every artist before him, he received no direct payment for…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *